Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2713 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €188.88 vs €532.27
- Up to 53% better value when playing New World than Core i9-13900F - €1.63 vs €3.48 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 32% better in New World than Core i7-6700K - 153 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 32 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
116
75%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.48/FPS
46%
Price, €
€532.27
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €532.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |