Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1361 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €188.88 vs €268.88
- Up to 29% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-9700F - €1.19 vs €1.68 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6700K - 160 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
159
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.68/FPS
70%
Price, €
€268.88
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for €268.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |