Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 296 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 17% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 349 vs 299 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 12 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
349
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €182.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10513 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |