Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 2356 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 25 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 48% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-640LM - 333 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 12 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-640LM
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
