Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-640LM vs Celeron G3900

Core i7-640LM vs Celeron G3900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2063 days newer than Core i7-640LM.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM

  • Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 25 vs 51 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900

  • Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-640LM - 170 vs 166 FPS
This is a free version of Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0.
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Extreme

Intel Core i7-640LM Logo
Core i7-640LM

Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010


FPS

166

97%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

170

100%

Value, €/FPS

€0.36/FPS

100%

Price, €

€60.9

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray

Buy for 60.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 203 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Extreme

Intel Core i7-640LM Logo
Core i7-640LM

Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-640LM Logo
Core i7-640LM

Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010


Single-Core

377

64%

Multi-Core

681

68%

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

581

100%

Multi-Core

992

100%

Intel Core i7-640LM Logo

Intel Core i7-640LM

vs
Intel Celeron G3900 Logo

Intel Celeron G3900

Jan 7th, 2010Release Date
Sep 1st, 2015
Core i7CollectionCeleron
ArrandaleCodenameSkylake
Intel BGA 1288SocketIntel Socket 1151
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
2Cores2
4
Threads2
2.1 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.8 GHz
2.9 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
25 W
TDP51 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
16.0xMultiplier
28.0x
HD Graphics (Ironlake)Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 510
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.