Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 2828 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-620M - 120 vs 110 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |