Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 735 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than FX-4130 - 175 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell E | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
