Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 490 days older than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - €182.45 vs €261.4
- Up to 30% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770K - €1.17 vs €1.66 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4930K - 157 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 77 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
156
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Buy for €261.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4930K | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |