Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Core i7-4910MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2292 days newer than Core i7-4910MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4910MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 47 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-4910MQ - 122 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4910MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€140.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €140.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15461 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4910MQ | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |