Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4820K outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4820K is 272 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1610 - 157 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i7-4820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
64.74164133738601%
Multi-Core
739
30.28688524590164%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
