Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3422 days newer than Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 115% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-4820K - 565 vs 263 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
565
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€342.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €342.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |