Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1128 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 47 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-4800MQ - 179 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 16 vs 8 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |