Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 188 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 15% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-8320 - 512 vs 445 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 47 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
