Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790T outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4790T is 514 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790T
- Performs up to 12% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Celeron G1620 - 168 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Core i7-4790T
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
35.56521739130435%
Multi-Core
723
21.384205856255544%
Intel Core i7-4790T | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
