Buy on Amazon
€261.4
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $350
Availability
MSRP in USD: $350
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4790K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2191 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4790K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 9% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i7-4790K - 108 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i7-4790K - €151.33 vs €261.4
- Up to 47% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i7-4790K - €1.4 vs €2.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i7-4790K - 65 vs 88 Watts
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core i7 i7-4790K Processore quad-core (4 core) 4 GHz - Presa H3 LGA-1150 Confezione CM8064601710501
Buy for €261.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
108
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10320 (fase base: 3,80 GHZ; attacco: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box, BX8070110320
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-4790K
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4790K | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 88 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
