Buy on Amazon
€635
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $320
Availability
MSRP in USD: $320
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-4771 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1858 days newer than Core i7-4771.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4771
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-4771 - 130 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4771 - 24 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Ryzen ™ Threadripper 2920X, TR4, Zen +, 12 core, 24 fili, 3,5 GHz, 4,3 GHz Turbo, 32 MB di cache, 64 canali, 180 W, CPU
Buy for €635 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76745 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4771
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4771
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1193
93.64207221350078%
Multi-Core
3857
51.74403005097934%
Intel Core i7-4771 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
