Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4750HQ outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4750HQ is 1772 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4750HQ
- Performs up to 19% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G4900 - 306 vs 257 FPS
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 47 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-4750HQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4750HQ | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Crystal Well | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
47 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
