Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Core i7-4600M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2433 days newer than Core i7-4600M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4600M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 37 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 10% better in New World than Core i7-4600M - 118 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4600M - 8 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
118
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€125.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €125.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 473 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4600M | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |