Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i7-3970X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1764 days newer than Core i7-3970X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3970X
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 150 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-3970X - 123 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3970X - 16 vs 12 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76693 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
Single-Core
648
55.47945205479452%
Multi-Core
3305
57.04176734552986%
Intel Core i7-3970X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |