Buy on Amazon
€25.22
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3930K outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3930K is 917 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Performs up to 7% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Phenom II X4 925 - 110 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
103
93.63636363636364%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Processore CPU AMD Phenom II X4 925 95W 2,8 GHz Quad-Core HDX925WFK4DGI/HDX925WFK4DGM Presa AM3 SENZA VENTOLA
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 244 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
52.8052805280528%
Multi-Core
930
31.40830800405269%
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 925 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | May 11th, 2009 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Deneb |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
