Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-3820QM vs Celeron G3900

Core i7-3820QM vs Celeron G3900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-3820QM outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3820QM is 1220 days older than Celeron G3900.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820QM

  • Performs up to 4% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G3900 - 28 vs 27 FPS
  • Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 45 vs 51 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Immortals of Aveum.
Immortals of Aveum

Immortals of Aveum

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i7-3820QM Logo
Core i7-3820QM

Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012


FPS

28

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

FPS Winner

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

27

96%

Value, €/FPS

€2.26/FPS

100%

Price, €

€60.9

100%

Value Winner

Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray

Buy for 60.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 47 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i7-3820QM Logo
Core i7-3820QM

Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-3820QM Logo
Core i7-3820QM

Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012


Single-Core

629

100%

Multi-Core

2147

100%

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

581

92%

Multi-Core

992

46%

Intel Core i7-3820QM Logo

Intel Core i7-3820QM

vs
Intel Celeron G3900 Logo

Intel Celeron G3900

Apr 29th, 2012Release Date
Sep 1st, 2015
Core i7CollectionCeleron
Ivy BridgeCodenameSkylake
Intel Socket G2 (988B)SocketIntel Socket 1151
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
4
Cores2
8
Threads2
2.7 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.8 GHz
3.7 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
45 W
TDP51 W
22 nmProcess Size
14 nm
27.0xMultiplier
28.0x
Intel HD 4000Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 510
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.