Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €49.99 vs €187.14
- Up to 68% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-11600KF - €0.34 vs €1.06 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-3820 - 177 vs 147 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
147
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
32%
Price, €
€187.14
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €187.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |