Buy on Amazon
€49.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2999 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - €49.99 vs €138.99
- Up to 60% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-10400 - €0.34 vs €0.86 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-3820 - 162 vs 147 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
147
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80619I73820 Processore Sandy Bridge E Core i7-3820 (3,6GHz, Sockel 2011)
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
39%
Price, €
€138.99
35%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10400, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 6 core fino a 4,3 GHz LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 65 W
Buy for €138.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
