Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1640 days newer than Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 19% better in War Thunder than Core i7-3770S - 166 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 44 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
56.93617021276596%
Multi-Core
2234
23.22486744983886%
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 22 |
| 8 | Threads | 44 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 145 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
