Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1929 days newer than Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 3% better in Fortnite than Core i7-3770S - 223 vs 216 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 32 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
57.13065755764304%
Multi-Core
2234
29.632577264889242%
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
