Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1768 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - €261.4 vs €290.43
- Up to 7% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 1700 - €1.51 vs €1.63 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770K - 178 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
173
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€261.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €261.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |