Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3803 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €158.88 vs €586.99
- Up to 63% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-13900K - €1.02 vs €2.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 37% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770 - 214 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 32 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
156
72%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11092 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.74/FPS
37%
Price, €
€586.99
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €586.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11093 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |