Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €51.99 vs €248.88
- Up to 78% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-11900F - €0.22 vs €0.99 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-3770 - 252 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
232
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
252
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
22%
Price, €
€248.88
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €248.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |