Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 3537 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - €158.88 vs €280.99
- Up to 32% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-12700F - €0.92 vs €1.35 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770 - 208 vs 172 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 20 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
172
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13080 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
68%
Price, €
€280.99
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €280.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13080 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |