Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €130.14 vs €200.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 35% better in F1 23 than Core i7-3770 - 222 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €130.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74105 minutes ago
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
671
46.66203059805285%
Multi-Core
2299
39.97565640758129%
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |