Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms Core i7-3687U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 2669 days newer than Core i7-3687U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3687U
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 17 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3687U - 121 vs 116 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3687U | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |