Buy on Amazon
€285
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Core i7-3667U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 142 days newer than Core i7-3667U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3667U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 1% better in War Thunder than Core i7-3667U - 132 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3667U - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€285
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FD8350FRHKHBX – FX-8350 CPU con Wraith Cooler AM3 + 125 W 4.0 GHz 16 MB Cache 32 nm Black Edition
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i7-3667U
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3667U | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
