Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Core i7-3632QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1340 days newer than Core i7-3632QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3632QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-3632QM - 342 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3632QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-3632QM
Mobile • Oct 19th, 2012
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3632QM | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
