Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3615QM outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3615QM is 238 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3615QM
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 23 than Celeron G540 - 155 vs 143 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3615QM | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |