Key Differences
In short — Xeon w7-2495X outperforms Core i7-3612QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w7-2495X is 3944 days newer than Core i7-3612QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3612QM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w7-2495X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon w7-2495X
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-3612QM - 193 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3612QM - 48 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3612QM
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Xeon w7-2495X
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3612QM
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
506
21.43159678102499%
Multi-Core
1681
8.980180565201133%
Intel Core i7-3612QM | vs | Intel Xeon w7-2495X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 15th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sapphire Rapids |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 4677 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 48 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
