Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Core i7-3612QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 4271 days newer than Core i7-3612QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 25% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3612QM - 139 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3612QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-3612QM
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3612QM
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
506
17.17583163611677%
Multi-Core
1681
10.596986698606822%
Intel Core i7-3612QM | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
