Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms Core i7-3612QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4271 days newer than Core i7-3612QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3612QM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 36% better in Minecraft than Core i7-3612QM - 821 vs 605 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3612QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-3612QM
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i5-14400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3612QM | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
