Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3612QM outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3612QM is 732 days older than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3612QM
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65578 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
99.80237154150198%
Multi-Core
854
50.803093396787624%
Intel Core i7-3612QM | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |