Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i7-3610QE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2923 days newer than Core i7-3610QE.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3610QE
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Minecraft than Core i7-3610QE - 746 vs 607 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3610QE - 20 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3610QE | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |