Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Core i7-3540M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2669 days newer than Core i7-3540M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3540M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3540M - 134 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3540M - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€139.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €139.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3443 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3540M | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |