Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 4019 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 25% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-2920XM - 288 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2920XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
288
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€160.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €160.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2920XM | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |