Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 1214 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2920XM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i7-2920XM - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-2920XM - 53 vs 55 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65532 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2920XM | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |