Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2411 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i7-2920XM - 169 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2920XM - 24 vs 8 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Core i7-2920XM
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2920XM
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
384
32.70868824531516%
Multi-Core
1269
18.190940366972477%
Intel Core i7-2920XM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
