Buy on Amazon
€254.09
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2738 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €254.09 vs €422.66
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-2700K - 134 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel Core i7-2700K Processore Sandy Bridge (3,5GHz, L3-Cache, Sockel 1155)
Buy for €254.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 457 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-9700F - Processore desktop 8 Core fino a 4,7 GHz senza processore grafico LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €422.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Single-Core
664
42.86636539703034%
Multi-Core
2264
36.18925831202046%
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
