Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3737 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-2675QM - 183 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€284.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €284.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2675QM | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |