Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1420 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 45 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-2675QM - 117 vs 115 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-2675QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2675QM | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
