Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-2670QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3758 days newer than Core i7-2670QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2670QM
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 45 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 103% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-2670QM - 479 vs 236 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
479
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €85.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2670QM | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |