Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4130 outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4130 is 972 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 45 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-2635QM - 120 vs 116 FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €18.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58093 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
449
45.12562814070352%
Multi-Core
1416
72.24489795918367%
Intel Core i7-2635QM | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |