Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Core i7-2630QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3405 days newer than Core i7-2630QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2630QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 85% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-2630QM - 131 vs 71 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2630QM - 20 vs 8 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€447.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €447.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2630QM | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |