Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Core i7-2630QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 3032 days newer than Core i7-2630QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2630QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 132% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-2630QM - 51 vs 22 FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
51
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €122.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58399 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
433
31.513828238719064%
Multi-Core
1365
37.20359771054783%
Intel Core i7-2630QM | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |